Comments on: Magnetic North vs Geographic (True) North Pole https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/ Geographic Information Systems Sat, 10 Jan 2026 05:23:18 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9 By: Nancy Wilson https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-459472 Sat, 10 Jan 2026 05:23:18 +0000 http://gisgeography.com/?p=5129#comment-459472 In reply to DLA.

The rise in Cancer is probably due to more complex and plentiful toxins in food and in the environment that are hard for the endocrine system and natural body detox systems to discharge. But if the thin atmoshere and ozone layer are allowing more harsh sunlight radiation onto the Earth, you are probably right about that too. Right now both poles are at record low sea ice levels (1/10/26) and there is much cloud coverover the Earth, so that might be masking the rays, while trapping heat in the amtosphere. When more ice is gone and greater drought arrives, there will be more cancerous and dangerous sun light and more advisories to stay out of sunlight.

]]>
By: MATT88 https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-358325 Fri, 29 Nov 2024 05:46:08 +0000 http://gisgeography.com/?p=5129#comment-358325 In reply to primero campanero.

sometimes when I read stupidity like what you wrote I wish satellites weren’t real, so that the digital word salad idiots like you spew out couldn’t reach my eyes

]]>
By: Dustin https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-343763 Sun, 25 Aug 2024 13:25:55 +0000 http://gisgeography.com/?p=5129#comment-343763 In reply to Icannot Believeit.

Only if you have put monkeys in ya ARSE!

]]>
By: BigDNerJons https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-343762 Sun, 25 Aug 2024 13:22:34 +0000 http://gisgeography.com/?p=5129#comment-343762 In reply to primero campanero.

Well said! They tell us satellites are real, but can’t monitor aircraft over oceans…. Wtf!

]]>
By: Curt Welch https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-341534 Tue, 06 Aug 2024 16:03:02 +0000 http://gisgeography.com/?p=5129#comment-341534 In reply to primero campanero.

How can someone be this dumb but still know how to type a message on the internet? I don’t get this. Can anyone explain this to me?

]]>
By: ZEEbo https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-336860 Mon, 01 Jul 2024 13:28:04 +0000 http://gisgeography.com/?p=5129#comment-336860 In reply to primero campanero.

This must be the Dumbest response ever posted.

]]>
By: Bob https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-335930 Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:47:22 +0000 http://gisgeography.com/?p=5129#comment-335930 In reply to JT Allyn.

Not correct. It has decreased by 30% in 3000 years.

]]>
By: Bob https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-335929 Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:46:19 +0000 http://gisgeography.com/?p=5129#comment-335929 In reply to Cameron Cook.

The earth is doing no such thing.

]]>
By: Bob https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-335927 Tue, 25 Jun 2024 08:41:25 +0000 http://gisgeography.com/?p=5129#comment-335927 In reply to Bielec.

Everyone understands that “North Pole” without qualification refers to the geographic North Pole.

]]>
By: Mark M https://gisgeography.com/magnetic-north-vs-geographic-true-pole/#comment-335767 Sun, 23 Jun 2024 23:32:10 +0000 http://gisgeography.com/?p=5129#comment-335767 In reply to Bud.

Bud—Regarding you first paragraph, if the 16 degree shift that you mention would be towards Kansas (your location,) then you should not experience any change in the difference between geographic north and magnetic north. However, if the 16 degree shift would be towards, let’s say, China, then you would have a larger difference between geo north and mag north than before.

Regarding your second paragraph, how many shots did you drink before writing it?

]]>