Comments on: ArcGIS Pro Review: 17 Reasons to Map Like a Pro https://gisgeography.com/arcgis-pro/ Geographic Information Systems Wed, 02 Apr 2025 00:46:06 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3 By: Richard https://gisgeography.com/arcgis-pro/#comment-316455 Fri, 26 Jan 2024 06:24:59 +0000 http://gisgeography.com/?p=14472#comment-316455 Pro will not work for anyone with an unreliable internet connection.

]]>
By: Jeff https://gisgeography.com/arcgis-pro/#comment-306253 Thu, 26 Oct 2023 11:23:27 +0000 http://gisgeography.com/?p=14472#comment-306253 I teach ArcGIS for health professionals who just want to map their data. I was excited to try Pro but I didn’t find it intuitive at all. Huge change from ArcMap. I tried making some basic maps in Pro for a colleague and after hours of trying to figure out how to add a basic shape file and finding no way to fix labels, I gave up and switched back to ArcMap. Hopefully Esri will fix the awful UI issues to align more with ArcMap before discontinuing it. Otherwise if I’m going to have to learn a slower and almost totally new program I will switch to QGIS. Esri needs to listen to the huge number of complaints online by their users. Pro is a hot mess.

]]>
By: John Diw https://gisgeography.com/arcgis-pro/#comment-241272 Wed, 08 Sep 2021 14:10:03 +0000 http://gisgeography.com/?p=14472#comment-241272 Nice ESRI commercial!

]]>
By: DFlater https://gisgeography.com/arcgis-pro/#comment-221457 Thu, 17 Jun 2021 04:19:22 +0000 http://gisgeography.com/?p=14472#comment-221457 Don’t combine general charts in ArcGIS Pro that you described with infographics. Infographics cost credits as they use business analyst/geoenrichment data. General charts (bar charts, scatter plots, etc) do not use credits.

]]>
By: Justin https://gisgeography.com/arcgis-pro/#comment-142678 Thu, 12 Nov 2020 02:58:14 +0000 http://gisgeography.com/?p=14472#comment-142678 I agree with Gord. It’s as if Esri have taken ArcMap and said “How can we take all the easy, intuitive functionality that exists in ArcMap, and make it as convoluted as possible? And while we’re at it, replace the simple mxd and with a whole aprx ecosystem with it’s own gdb, index folders, toolboxes and a whole bunch of other stuff that no one will use.”
Don’t like it!

]]>
By: Hervé https://gisgeography.com/arcgis-pro/#comment-124112 Tue, 08 Sep 2020 11:30:21 +0000 http://gisgeography.com/?p=14472#comment-124112 How to buy and download ArcGIS Pro

]]>
By: Sam Dolce https://gisgeography.com/arcgis-pro/#comment-64415 Thu, 06 Feb 2020 01:33:22 +0000 http://gisgeography.com/?p=14472#comment-64415 Maps look fantastic in ArcGIS Pro. Only complaint is putting in definition queries. Seems to take a long. Also, projects seem a little bulky with all the files it creates. Still getting used to it.

]]>
By: Gord in the North https://gisgeography.com/arcgis-pro/#comment-49758 Mon, 04 Nov 2019 23:06:12 +0000 http://gisgeography.com/?p=14472#comment-49758 ArcGIS Pro? Um… no thanks…and not anytime soon. If ESRI tries to force it upon everyone by discontinuing Desktop… then I will be jumping from the ArcShip pretty quick… I hear QGIS 3 is pretty bangin’ ;-)

]]>